By Carolyn Ravenscroft, DRHS Archivist & Historian
The title of this article sounds like a YA murder mystery, and if I ever get around to it, it someday may become one. In the meantime, let me tell you about one of the oddest and most mysterious stories to come out of 19th-century Duxbury…
In 1852, Capt. Eben Fish left his house at 66 Franklin Street to gather berries for his wife, Ruth (Weston), who had just delivered a baby girl. While traipsing across his property, he discovered the body of an unknown woman. A brief news article from the time related the incident without much fanfare – and no other information ever came to light. 1852 was a different time, and an unidentified body simply remained a mystery.
Luckily for us, we have the diary entry of Edward Baker, a 21-year-old sailor at the time, home between voyages. Edward, or Ned as he was called, was a neighbor of Eben Fish. He had grown up in the Crooked Lane section of Duxbury, and had kept a diary since he was a boy.
He gives us a much more detailed and disturbing account of what transpired in Wildcat Swamp:

Sept. 2, 1852 …Quite an incident occurred in our vicinity. Last night as Capt. Fish was over mending his fence in and around his swamp (wildcat swamp so called) and in pursuit of some dangleberries for his wife who by the bye is in a delicate situation, having given birth to a daughter on Tuesday last, he suddenly came upon the remains of a woman lying face down, and with her face in a pond of water. After passing a sleepless night at home, he started early this morning for the coroner, Major [Avery] Richards of Duxbury, who came up and accompanied by Capt. [Fish], Joseph [Fish]. and Mr. Dorr, and E. Prior, repaired to the place where she was seen lying, and here I think that the coroner grossly neglected his duty, for no jury was called, no inquest held, and of course, no cause assigned for her death, and furthermore, the coroner at first ordered a hole dug upon the spot, that they might shove the bones in without gathering them up, but it being found impossible to get earth enough out – as she lay in a pond hole – they repaired to the upland, where an excavation was made into which they conveyed it by some means, I know not what, and also threw in several (I think there were a number more than one) thus I heard it, bundles with dresses, etc. which were lying beside a tree close to where she apparently had died, and covered them all up together as they would have done the remains of a dog! She was dressed in a blue jean gown, farther I know not concerning her dress, it is supposed to be a woman whom Joseph Fish saw in that vicinity July fifth and who he says ran or walked off when she saw him, and I believe he did the same…
The above description differs in an important detail from the news account – Ned claims there was no inquest. He was not an eye-witness to the events, he received the information second-hand, but he seems pretty definite that the woman was unceremoniously buried on the spot. Who was this woman? Why the quick disposal of her body? There is a story here…but one for which we will never know the truth. But boy, do I have some wild speculations…






